ICO Accused of Shady Practices ICO took place on June 20,2017 raising  more than $270 million making it the most successful ICO of the history of cryptocurrencies. Despite being such a successful ICO, has been accused of using shady practices in the ICO.

Issues with ICO

The Ethereum network once again faced several issues during the ICO just like it did during the Bancor ICO. The whole Ethereum network went into backlog and started to clog. This resulted in failed transactions and people not able to send funds to the smart contract. After the mess started to clear up, it was found that the first few transactions that got cleared were huge and were from whitelisted addresses that didnt follow the Gas limit set by the team.

It was later addressed by the team that those transactions were not by a single person but were pooled up transactions of 2000 people with a KYC process from ICOage. The second transaction was pooled up transaction from imToken. This was done to prevent the network from being ddosed. However, some contributors still set the gas price about the limit which resulted in the network congestion.

Despite the explanation given above the team, the community has accused them of setting such obscene hardcap to which no explanation has been provided. Also, the users were not informed promptly about the whitelisting address procedure. It was explained on the website but wasnt available clearly to users.

Apart from these issues, there was also reports against f2pool of removing user’s transaction with their own transactions so that they secure a position in the ICO before anybody else.



Despite all the issues, it is still a fact that raised $270 million in their ICO which is huge. However getting returns on this is going to be difficult for the investors if the team fails to deliver. What do you people think about the above issues? Should there be lower hard cap on ICO’s? How can this be avoided in the future? Let us know in the comments.

Please follow and like us:

Shivam Chawla

Following CryptoCurrencies since 2013. If you like my articles, follow me at

3 thoughts on “ ICO Accused of Shady Practices

  • June 22, 2017 at 2:11 pm

    Why not have a pre-presale for those groups and your whales in advance? Maybe it’s only obvious in hindsight. I think a lot of future fundraisers can learn a lot from this.

  • June 22, 2017 at 6:37 pm

    8 young guys gathering 270 million dollars for writing a whitepaper based on an already existing application. It’s good marketing and that end of story and end of money.

  • Pingback: Ethereum Price Crash After Status.IM ICO Network Clog | Blockchaind.Net

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: